Buzz Zaino: Royce Fund Manager Sees Strong Growth Upside for 2013, Boosted by Housing, Transportation, IT Spending

ZainoB_gBoniface A. (“Buzz”) Zaino is a portfolio manager advising several of the high-profile Royce Funds, to wit, the Royce Opportunity Fund and associated funds. By any measure a veteran of the industry, Buzz has more than 40 years of experience in the financial services industry, the last 14 with Royce. I first met him when he was managing the Value Added Funds for Trust Company of the West more than 20 years ago, but prior to that he was president of the Lehman Capital Fund and a principal of the “original” Lehman Brothers. He went to school at Fordham, and took his MBA from Columbia. In 44 years, Buzz has seen enough economic cycles to offer an MBA from the University of Zaino.

Buzz agreed to talk about his 2013 outlook from his home in Aspen which, like much of the US snow belt, has seen little of the white stuff so far this year.

JA: It seems generally agreed that the US economy is growing at a slower pace than it has coming out of previous recessionary periods. What is your outlook for 2013? Will the economy continue to grow, and if so, will it grow at the same rate, faster or slower?

BZ: The reason that the US economy has had a slow lift-off has been that coming out of recessions in the past, the Fed has lowered interest rates, and people took that opportunity to buy houses and cars. This recession was different, because the banks were not giving out money, because money was scarcer and because bank lending standards were significantly more stringent. So there was a hiatus and it took a lot longer for the economy to recover. The recovery finally started this year, 2012, and it is finally beginning to give a boost to the economy, especially as construction gets going again. That boost is going to continue, and it will help us accelerate in 2013. But the recovery was complicated by the fact that Europe went into recession. American companies tend to be worldwide in scope, and caution at the top levels helped bring inventory levels down due to the European recession. That meant that capital spending was also muted. I think that capital spending is also constrained in anticipation of the budget settlement that is still out in the future. A “normal” recovery was delayed until 2012, and then delayed again by the European recession. But those delays now give us the opportunity to accelerate as 2013 progresses.

JA: Will we get a budget?

BZ: Sooner or later, yes. We will get a budget deal out of Congress. Once we have that deal defined, we can go forward from there. That will be a positive, and will be on top of the acceleration we can expect from normal factors like housing and auto sales. We could get a nice surprise in 2013. But we’re cautious about January.

JA: Why is that?

BZ: Most managers will make their January decisions based on their December orderbooks, and we don’t think the December orderbooks will be strong enough to give them confidence, but as we go into February and March, a lot of the inventory build-up will have started to occur, so the orderbooks will look better. And the trade between China and the US is expanding again, after a period of slower growth. We think that could have an increasing effect, especially after the Lunar New Year. By the end of the first quarter, growth could be looking quite good.

JA: The harsh talk by Washington DC and Beijing won’t slow down that growth?

BZ: The China-US trade is too big a market for both sides, and politics will not interfere with it. Certainly the Chinese government’s expansion plans are not going to be held back. There are Chinese hotel companies looking for hotel properties in the US – to build or to buy. Very smart people, and I don’t think either side is going to let politics inhibit our trade relationships. Nothing is going to come of the yelling.

JA: Will the growth rate be higher going into the second quarter then?

BZ: I think we could have a weak-ish economy and market in January, like I said. Everyone will be paying higher taxes, at least with FICA deductions back in everybody’s paychecks. With orderbooks in December that may not be strong, managers and consumers could still have their hands in their pockets. If we have a warm winter like we had last year, we could have more construction starts. If we have a cold, snowy winter, those starts could be delayed, and the weak period could extend through January. We are looking very favorably at housing. Housing is still somewhat depressed, but the housing stock is aging — and mortgage money is more available than it was a year ago. And the automobile fleet is aging and will need to be updated, as will the commercial truck fleet.

JA: Do you think the growth rate will exceed 2%?

BZ: Yes, better than 2%, but maybe not in January. But after that it could be substantially more than 2%. Four to five percent would not be out of the ballpark, although 5% would be at the high end of probability. And the market would react to that. If the market is down – and cheap – they don’t want to buy, but if it goes up 15%, everybody wants to buy. If UPS starts to replace its fleet and buys trucks, all the others will update their fleets at the same time. It’s much cheaper to run your truck or your fleet on CNG (compressed natural gas) too. A town near Aspen has converted their entire bus fleet to CNG, and although they can fuel up at the bus barn, there are additional CNG stations being built. Boone Pickens and his group are encouraging these new CNG fueling stations. We’re surprised that trucking companies are not moving faster than they are toward natural gas. We have an investment in a building materials company and I asked them if they are considering CNG, and they said they had not looked into it, but they would. Conversions to CNG are not expensive. Ford and GM are now offering pickup trucks with CNG engines.

JA: Is there going to be a fiscal cliff solution?

BZ: Eventually. Whether or not it happens before December 31, there’s no way to tell. But the congress can pass a continuing resolution to postpone the cuts and tax increases while they work on it. Eventually this Mexican standoff will be resolved. And by the way, the fiscal cliff does not seem to be a big motivator for the American consumer. They need to replace things, and they are not overly concerned with the big picture as long as the economy seems to be getting healthier.

JA: What sectors are going to do better as the economy improves?

BZ: IT spending will pick up. There is a big pent-up need factor here, and it has been a relatively easy way to postpone expenditures for the last couple of years. Windows 8 is very much under-rated. It takes a while for people and corporations to decide to make a big change like the change to Windows 8, but it will be very good for PC companies. Corporations need to have the latest and fastest. Technology in corporate environments needs to be the newest and most capable. Areas like IT are why you can think of higher growth rates. After this hiatus, there is enough pent-up need to start a new momentum.

JA: How about healthcare IT?

BZ: I went to see my physician in New York, and he is one of the best, highest-rated doctors in his specialty. He was really annoyed that he was going to have to convert my file, which is a manila folder with all kinds of paper and bits of paper in it – to computer files. I thought, hey, this is 2012, get with the plan.

JA: How about housing? Any areas there where investors ought to be looking?

BZ: We have had a good run with housing companies, and we think that will continue. One area that may have real potential is mortgage insurance companies. It is a fairly narrow field, and some people infer from the papers that these companies may not be able to cover their losses. The reality is that housing prices could be moving up at a rate of nearly 1% per month in the near future, and as a result those liabilities would be decreasing. Mortgage applications for refinancing were up last week 47% year over year. That’s a meaningful number. Apparently not everyone is under water. Those areas that have dropped the most are improving the fastest in some cases. California is one of those.

JA: Any areas where you would be wary going forward?

BZ: Defense companies. We think there will be lots of cutbacks, lots of programs cancelled. Defense personnel contractors may do better as the armed services cut back their personnel. Company by company there may be some good bets in defense, but we believe the sector will be down.

JA: And in summary?

BZ: Other than defense, it is going to be a broad-based recovery. If we have a growing, recovering economy, interest rates would rise, and inflation would rise. Commercial banks will do better. They will use their asset bases to increase lending. The moderating factor will be that regulations will add some cost, but that will not be an inhibitor for the larger banks looking to expand regionally. If I were a larger bank and wanted to expand regionally, it would be attractive to me to buy a regional bank and expand my profitability without appreciably expanding my regulatory exposure.

JA: Thanks, Buzz.

Note: Buzz prefers not to name specific companies in his portfolios. The interviewer has no investments in the sectors discussed, and does not intend to initiate such investments in the next few days or weeks.

Hot Market Driving Interest in Automotive Technologies, Both Old and New

They say the used car market is hot right now, thanks mostly to the slumping economy. But even a hot market can’t really explain the recent news from CNNMoney that the world’s oldest, still running used car just sold for $4.6 million (http://money.cnn.com/2011/10/10/autos/worlds_oldest_car/index.htm?iid=HP_Highlight). No, this 1884 De Dion-Bouton et Trepardoux, also called “La Marquise,” is a collector’s item and its selling price, according to the report is the “highest price ever paid for an early automobile at auction” and twice what its owners expected. The car certainly offers an interesting look at how automotive technology has changed over the years.

This is, in effect, where car technology started: Its fuel was not gasoline, but powered by steam created by “coal, wood and bits of paper.” Top speed is 38 miles per hour but it takes about a half hour to warm up and create enough power to drive it.

Of course, for our purposes, this is an interesting ignition point for covering some of the new automotive technologies that are powering some small cap stocks. Here are just a few and perhaps we can add to this list in the near future:

Cincinnati-based AMP Electric Vehicles * (OTCBB: AMPD, http://www.ampelectricvehicles.com/) is a young company that currently retrofits those sport utility vehicles (SUVs) and crossovers that Americans love to emission-free pure electric vehicles. AMPD is currently working on the Mercedes Benz SUV ML 350; they drop out the internal combustion engine completely and integrate their proprietary electric drive components into the Mercedes, leaving all the safety and luxury components intact. Drivers tell us that the superb M-B performance is not only undiminished; in some ways it is actually enhanced. CEO Jim Taylor is a former President of GM’s Cadillac division and CEO of its former Hummer division.  We anticipate announcements about the Jeep Cherokee as well.  The stock trades thinly, as often happens in such early stage companies, and is currently selling for $0.50. Its 52-week high is $1.05.

New Castle, PA-based Axion Power International * (OTCBB: AXPW.OB, http://www.axionpower.com/) manufactures high-performance low-cost lead-carbon (PbC(R)) batteries for a variety of markets, including for “mild” and “micro” hybrid vehicles, which are anticipated to be the commonest form of hybrid in the US within a couple of years (and it already is the most common in Europe). Its PbC batteries are as easy to manufacture as the older lead-acid batteries, but they use activated carbon instead of half the lead.  They are lighter and 100% recyclable (unlike lithium ion batteries), and have a higher charge acceptance and faster recharging rates, making them ideal for the growing  micro-hybrid and mild hybrid markets.  AXPW stock closed Oct. 10 $0.51, near the low end of its 52-week range ($0.42-$1.27).

San Carlos, CA-based Tesla Motors (Nasdaq: TSLA, http://www.teslamotors.com/) manufactures the Tesla Roadster and other electric vehicles and electric powertrain  components. With a market cap of $2.9 billion it’s really out of our smallcap focus, but it certainly should be included in even a brief survey of new automotive technologies. Its stock was highest (more than $35) about a year ago but like many companies now is languishing. It closed Oct. 10 at $27.80.

Northville, MI-based Amerigon * (Nasdaq: ARGN, http://www.amerigon.com/) is the world’s leading marketer of thermoelectric technologies for automobiles and is best known for its actively heated and cooled seat systems featured in more than 50 vehicles. But it is winning new headlines for a thermoelectric generator (TEG) that the company is developing with partners including BMW, Ford and Caltech’s Jet Propulsion Lab. The TEG converts waste exhaust heat into electricity, a technology that has been shown to reduce toxic emissions and increase fuel economy along with providing a much needed new source for electricity in a vehicle. The TEG is currently being tested in a BMW X6 and Lincoln MKT. The stock closed Oct. 10 at $14.02, down from its $18.18 high for the past year, but above the $9.33 low.

Oak Park, MI-based Azure Dynamics (Toronto: AZD.TO, http://www.azuredynamics.com/) develops and manufactures electric power trains for light and heavy-duty commercial vehicles, including vans and buses. The company is best known for partnering with Ford and building the electric drivetrains for the all-electric Ford Transit Connect. Azure recently announced that it is enrolling Ford truck dealerships across North America to be electric Transit Connect dealers and service centers, the sale of 100 electric Transit Connect vans in Europe, and the sale of 34 electric Transit Connect to municipalities and a regional governmental authority in North America. Its stock closed Oct. 10 at $0.15 with a 52-week range of $0.11-$0.41.

* Denotes client of Allen & Caron, Inc., publisher of this blog

All Aboard: Railroad Stocks on a Roll

This could be the best thing to happen to the railroad industry since Warren Buffet. Last year, when Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway bought Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) for $34 billion, the investment community took notice.

This week, another news item has investors eyeing railroads once again. Three Democratic senators, led by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D. NJ), have co-sponsored a bill called the Focusing Resources, Economic Investment and Guidance to Help Transportation Act of 2010 or, more simply, the FREIGHT Act (S.3529). “If you want to help U.S. business succeed and create new jobs, we need a freight transportation system that works better and can grow with the changing needs of the global economy,” said Sen. Lautenberg in a statement. Can government funding be far behind?

There have been a flurry of news reports lately on the swelling prospects of railroad companies. The Wall Street Journal weighed in (http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2010/07/13/csx-earnings-the-view-on-the-stuff-moving-business/?mod=yahoo_hs) after a “rosy” second quarter results report from railroad industry giant Jacksonville, FL-based CSX Corporation (NYSE: CSX, http://www.csx.com), a national hauler of freight and passengers. The Economist lauded America’s freight railway system as “the world’s best” (http://www.economist.com/node/16636101) but warned that new proposals for high-speed passenger railways could endanger the system. As for the new FREIGHT Act, Progressiverailroading.com did a nice job of covering the the possibilities the legislation offers the railroads (http://www.progressiverailroading.com/news/article.asp?id=23896) , suggesting the Act “seeks to ‘transform’ U.S. transportation.”

Many of the large cap railroad companies have already been on a roll, thanks largely to increasing freight volumes and cost control measures, particularly Omaha, NE-based Union Pacific (NYSE: UNP, http://www.up.com). Longbow Research Analyst Lee Klaskow noted that UNP has “transformed itself from an industry laggard to an industry leader.” Its stock price was transformative as well, resting at $69.12 as recently as July 21 but closing after hours July 26 at $75.76.

There are even a few small cap stocks to play in this sector. Worcester, MA-based Providence and Worcester Railroad Co. (Nasdaq: PWX, http://www.pwrr.com), an interstate freight carrier operating in New York, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut, is tiny by railroad standards, just over $58 million in market cap. And it trades by appointment, averaging only 1,350 in volume per day. A bit larger ($1.7 billion market cap) is Greenwich, CT-based Genesee & Wyoming Inc. (NYSE: GWR, http://www.gwrr.com), which owns and operates short line and regional freight railroads in the U.S., Australia, Canada and the Netherlands. It’s stock has been thriving and jumped up $2.47 to $41.26 on July 26, nearly all the way up to its 52-week high of $41.62 reached last April.

A small, pre-revenue passenger train, Las Vegas-based Las Vegas Railway Express * (OTC:BB: XTRN.OB, http://www.xtrainvegas.com) has created the XTrain which, once it’s rolling, aims to make the five-hour trip through the desert from LA to Las Vegas a whole lot more fun and more friendly to the environment. It’s early for investors, which is why the stock is still very cheap (25 cents). But one word in a statement from American Association of Railroads President and CEO Edward Hamberger might be a good omen. Commenting on the FREIGHT Act Hamberger said: “This bill recognizes the importance of rail…as the safest, most fuel efficient and highly cost-effective way to move both people and goods.” (The italics are mine) Perhaps passenger trains, as well as the freights, may be beneficiaries of the bill.

* Denotes Allen & Caron client

Heavy Vehicles Trailblazing for EVs: 2nd in a Series

This morning, the widely read website, seekingalpha.com, published an article with an intriguing headline: “Electric Cars Could Dominate Market by 2030.”  The article is based on a study carried out at UC Berkeley, and the proviso is revealing: “provided that consumers don’t have to buy the high-priced batteries themselves and an infrastructure can be built to maintain and manage them.” (http://seekingalpha.com/article/152127-electric-cars-could-dominate-market-by-2030).  There it is: the key to our willingness or ability to switch to electric vehicles is the batteries that power them.  The study is worth looking at (there is a link in the article above), and it figures the cost of an infrastructure to handle batteries at $320+ billion, partially offset by a saving of $205 billion occasioned by reduced healthcare costs due to fewer harmful emissions.  The article also ventures a guess that emissions could be reduced by 62% from 2003 levels, and that 350,000 new jobs could be added to the economy. 

In the first article in this series, we had a brief look at the definitions of two types of hybrids: power-split hybrids and mild hybrids.  We believe that these hybrids will dominate the EV market for the midterm at least, and that the pure EV market will arrive in terms of meaningful numbers several years down the pike.

Before we discuss the battery market, we should note that heavy vehicle operators, makers and conversion specialists may well be leading the way in emission reductions.  Torrance CA-based Enova Systems (Amex: ENA, http://www.enovasystems.com/) is an example of the conversion specialist.  It has had a string of good news recently, including a news bulletin this morning on its work with Smith Electric Vehicles, with vehicles delivered to numerous illustrious (and big) companies like AT&T, Frito-Lay, Coca-Cola, Staples, and PG&E (http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Enova-Systems-Sees-Fleet-bw-2788026103.html?x=0&.v=1).  ENA shares languish, primarily it seems because the audience is small, and the stock is trading at $0.52 vs a 52-week high of $3.45, a market cap of under $11 million, and average volume of only 30,000 (though that is not double-counted).  ENA is reporting losses and probably is due for some dilution from new financings in the future, but its market seems to be growing by leaps and bounds, and the endorsements of big companies can do nothing but good for them.

At the same time, Mississauga ONT-based Azure Dynamics (TSX:  AZD, Pink Sheets:  AZDDF; http://www.azuredynamics.com/), also a pennystock is developing, building and selling hybrid trucks delivery vans for companies like FedEx, and passenger busses for municipal bus lines.  We have written about AZD in the past.

Azure Dynamics Hybrid Delivery Van

Azure Dynamics Hybrid Delivery Van

AZD shares trade fairly heavily on the TSX, with an average daily volume of nearly 1.5 million shares.  The US Pink Sheets version of the stock trades far less (70,000 shares), but that is the price we will quote because it is in USD: $0.19 vs a 52-week high of $0.27.  AZD is also reporting losses and consuming cash, but it is hard to imagine how a company gearing up to make fleet vans and trucks and city busses could do so without breaking a few eggs.  They announced a supply agreement with Johnson Controls earlier this year.

Another Canadian company,  Reno-based Altair Nanotechnologies (Nasdaq: ALTI, http://www.altairnano.com/) is concentrating in its transportation segment in batteries for heavy-duty vehicles and municipal busses, although we hasten to add that its primary identification is with the storage of energy from renewable sources, and if you go to their website, the first thing you will see is wind turbines.  Altairnano batteries for the transport market are lithium ion powered.  ALTI shares are trading at $1.03 at the moment, vs a 52-week high of $2.94, and the average volume is nearly 700,000 shares, so there is some liquidity.

We did an article on the subject of busses on June 8.  If you put “hybrid bus” into the search engine of this blog, you can get to that article.  There are illustrations of several, including one from privately held, Golden CO-based Proterra, (http://www.proterraonline.com/pdfs/Index-5_Page-1.pdf).

In the next article in this series, we will start to look at batteries, which, as the SeekingAlpha article that began this article says clearly, are the sine qua non of hybrids now and EVs later.

Hybrid Buses May Be Pioneers When We Look Back in a Few Years

2004: The first GM hybrid delivered to Seattle, looking very much like a traditional bus (http://editorial.autos.msn.com/article.aspx?cp-documentid=435202)

2004: The first GM hybrid delivered to Seattle, looking very much like a traditional bus (http://editorial.autos.msn.com/article.aspx?cp-documentid=435202)

The municipal authorities around the United States — bus systems and school systems most obviously — have been way out in front of the breaking wave of interest in greentech, emissions control, carbon footprints.  The general public is mostly still driving internal combustion-driven vehicles, in spite of the rising sales of hybrid electric vehicles like the market-dominant Toyota Prius.

By early 2008 GM was delivering its 100th GM-Allison hybrid, this one to Las Vegas, and Seattle ordered an additional 500 such buses in May 2007. http://www.autobloggreen.com/2008/01/09/las-vegas-to-the-get-the-1000th-gm-allison-hybrid-bus-this-month/.  In October 2007, New York City announced it would acquire 850 hybrid buses for $435 million.

Of course a lot has happened since the first GM-Allison bus was delivered in 2003.  Now Allison is owned by The Carlyle Group, having been sold by GM for $5.6 billion in the good old days when automobiles were still selling and car companies still looked like they had a chance of being viable.   And, of course, GM sucked up a lot of federal stimulus money and still declared bankruptcy, was dropped from the NYSE, and is now a Pink Sheets small-cap (Pink Sheets: GMGMQ,  http://www.gm.com/),  with a market cap of about $528 million as of the close of the market on Friday, and a stock price of $0.78.  A deal was announced to sell the Saturn division to Penske Automotive Group (NYSE:PAG, http://www.penskeautomotive.com/), itself arguably a small cap with a market cap of only $1.3 billion, and a closing stock price of $14.65 vs a 52-week high of $23.58.

But in the meantime, evolution has been a strong force in municipal buses and school buses, with some small players emerging as interesting companies to watch.

Proterra All-Electric Clean Bus in San Jose

Proterra All-Electric Clean Bus in San Jose

The  all-electric clean bus by Golden, CO-based privately held Proterra (http://www.proterraonline.com/)  , with batteries probably from Reno-based Altair Nanotechnologies (Nasdaq: ALTI, http://www.altairnano.com/), presents one vision of the future, built entirely of composites to minimize weight, and streamlined beyond what the bus designers of yesteryear could have imagined.  ALTI shares are still somewhat down-and-out, closing Friday at $0.94 vs a 52-week high of $2.94, and a market cap a hair under $90 million, but average trading of 500,000 shares, which may make it easier to look at as a stock to be interested in.   Autobloggreen article on the Proterra bus: http://www.autobloggreen.com/2009/02/08/proterra-touring-california-with-fast-charging-electric-bus/.

Given Germany’s reputation as a leader in greentech, it is also worth noting that Puchheim, Germany-based Proton Motor Fuel Cell GmBH (http://www.proton-motor.de/ )  has teamed up with Czech partner, Pilsen-based Skoda Electric, and announced last month a bus on a standard chassis with no internal combustion engine at ALL — just a combination of fuel cells, batteries and ultracapacitors.  http://www.proton-motor.de/fileadmin/documents_pm/press_releases/20090508_TripleHybridBusPreview_EN.pdf

Proton-Skoda Pure Electric Fuel-Cell-battery-Ultracapacitor Bus

Proton-Skoda Pure Electric Fuel-Cell-battery-Ultracapacitor Bus

Torrance, CA-based Enova Systems (Amex: ENA, http://www.enovasystems.com/)  has teamed up with Navistar’s IC Corporation to build a plug-in hybrid diesel that is now operating at the top of the western hemisphere in Alaska’s Denali National Park.  The bus is claimed to use 70% less fuel than a conventional bus. http://gas2.org/2008/07/30/plug-in-hybrid-bus-at-denali-np-uses-up-to-70-less-fuel/

Enova-IC Corp bus for Denali Natl Park

Enova-IC Corp bus for Denali Natl Park

ENA shares have been largely ignored by the market, closing Friday at $0.83, up $0.08 on a very light 24,000 shares.  The year-high was $4.70, and the market cap is a very low $17 million, but it may well be a diamond in the rough.   It is also the go-to company behind the Hybrid Electric School Bus Project, in which it is partnered with Raleigh, NC-based state-sponsored Advanced Energy, which says it has delivered school buses to Austin, Napa CA, and two school districts in NC. http://www.hybridschoolbus.com/.

We should also point out Oak Park, MI-based Azure Dynamics (TSE: AZD and Pink Sheets: AZDDF, http://www.azuredynamics.com/).  AZD announced this year a 5-year pack with Johnson Controls to supply advanced li-ion batteries for its commercial vehicles and buses, including the Altoona.  AZDDF closed Friday at $0.23 and has an average volume of 115,000 shares.  It was formerly listed on AIM, but is no longer.

Azure Dynamics' Altoona CitiBus

Azure Dynamics' Altoona CitiBus

As always we have no recommendations on these companies, nor is this an attempt to equably survey the hybrid bus market, which is also being supplied by very large companies that are completely outside our area of interest.  We write about companies that we find newsworthy.